HomeHealth Care NewsTelehealth Regulatory Relief Provides Health Care Lifeline

Telehealth Regulatory Relief Provides Health Care Lifeline

New regulatory reforms creating relief from rules in virtual visits with physicians are playing a major role in helping Americans work through the growing changes caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) are now reimbursing physicians for virtual visits or telehealth services, as well as phone calls with patients, at the same amount as in-person visits. Effective on March 6, 2020, the CMS lifted some restrictions in three areas: Medicare telehealth visits, virtual check-ins, and e-visits. All told, the changes involve more than 80 telehealth services and cover visits in all settings, including a patient’s home. The CMS introduced further reforms on May 1 increasing access for patients without video capability.

Before the reform, Congress had prohibited full reimbursement for virtual doctor visits, except in underserved areas, and in those cases, the patient had to log on at a hospital or clinic for the service. The CMS made the changes under President Donald Trump’s emergency declaration.

Helping in Crisis

Telehealth, which allows patients to connect remotely with medical professionals, is an area where deregulation has empowered patients during the crisis and provided public health benefits. The remote nature of telehealth allows physicians to keep their practices open during the shutdowns while protecting themselves and others from those who may be contagious with the coronavirus or other illnesses.

Telehealth has also reduced the burden on hospital emergency rooms by enabling providers to screen patients safely to determine whether they need such intensive care, before they come to the ER. Telehealth is particularly advantageous for elderly individuals, who are more susceptible to health damage from COVID-19. Virtual visits have also allowed private physician practices to stay open during state shutdowns.

“We are glad CMS heard our concerns about physician practices,” said American College of Physicians President Robert McLean, M.D., in a news release. “The changes by CMS will help practices by providing them with revenue to keep their practices open as they move away from in-person to virtual ones.”

More Obstacles Removed

Providers are required to use an interactive audio and video telecommunications system so real-time communication can occur between the provider and patient at home.

Although the March billing change strengthened patient access to telehealth, it overlooked the fact that many patients do not have two-way video capability at home. That meant providers would be unable to bill the CMS for helping those patients through remote audio consultation. Recognizing this obstacle, the CMS on May 1 changed the rules to allow billing for telephone and other audio-only telehealth visits.

The May 1 reforms also expanded the categories of providers allowed to provide telehealth services to patients. Before this reform, only doctors, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and certain other individuals could provide telehealth services. Now, physical therapists, occupational therapists, and speech language pathologists can bill for telehealth visits.

AMA Supported Change

The change was so well-received that after years of remaining neutral on telehealth, the American Medical Association (AMA) endorsed the idea, announced initially by the CMS March 11.

In the run-up to those changes, the AMA on April 10 sent letters to the National Governors Association, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, and the National Council of Insurance Commissioners to support policies encouraging telehealth and other innovations that improve patients’ access to doctors.

“The AMA strongly encourages all states to adopt telehealth policies that reflect those now being required under Medicare,” states one of the letters.

‘Ahead of the Game’

The suspension of regulations in a variety of areas during the coronavirus pandemic has been good public policy, says John Goodman, Ph.D., president and chief executive officer of the Goodman Institute for Public Policy Research and co-publisher of Health Care News.

“Governmental bodies are repealing laws, suspending regulations, and ignoring previous restrictions that impeded the ability of the private sector to act,” said Goodman. “They are liberating doctors, nurses, drug manufacturers, test makers, makers of personal protective equipment, etc. to do things that were illegal only a few months ago. Fortunately, the Trump administration was ahead of the game, making many needed changes before the COVID-19 virus hit. Once in crisis mode, Congress and state governments also responded, apparently in sheer desperation.”

‘Should Do More’

The changes are welcome, and Congress and the states should implement further reforms, says Marie Fishpaw, director of domestic policy studies at The Heritage Foundation.

“President Trump reiterated his commitment to clearing away barriers inhibiting the use of telehealth,” said Fishpaw. “Lawmakers have already moved to clear some away, but they can and should do more.”

There are still some important government-imposed barriers to telehealth, says Fishpaw.

“Among them are wide variations in the description of telemedicine among the states, with different definitions, regulations, and reimbursement arrangements,” said Fishpaw. “Only nine states have issued licenses related to telehealth that allow an out-of-state licensed medical professional to render services using telehealth.”

Great strides have been made in the increased use and acceptance of telehealth, and this should continue after the national emergency caused by COVID-19 ends, says Fishpaw.

“Absolutely, policymakers should build on the regulatory relief that the administration, Congress, and some states have done,” said Fishpaw. “This will help patients to access this care going forward and create an environment where innovators can develop new telehealth tools that we can’t even begin to imagine today. In addition, we not only need to make access to telemedicine permanent, but lawmakers should remove additional barriers that prevent patients from receiving timely and affordable care.”

 

Kelsey E. Hackem, J.D. (khackem@gmail.comwrites from the state of Washington.

 

Internet Info:

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Medicare Telemedicine Health Care Provider Fact Sheet, March 17, 2020: https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact-sheets/medicare-telemedicine-health-care-provider-fact-sheet

 

Kelsey Hackem
Kelsey Hackem
Kelsey E. Hackem is a freelance writer based in Washington state. She has experience litigating cases to advance and protect property rights, taxpayer and entrepreneur rights, parental rights, and search and seizure at a non-profit law firm in Ohio. She earned her undergraduate degree from the University of Florida and her J.D. from Villanova University.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

spot_img
spot_img

Most Popular

- Advertisement -spot_img
- Advertisement -spot_img

Recent Comments