Home Health Care News Free to Choose Medicine Can Bring Warp Speed to More Innovation -...

Free to Choose Medicine Can Bring Warp Speed to More Innovation – Commentary

By Christina Herrin

COVID-19 has upended our lives and highlighted government incompetence, but it is also necessary to showcase the government’s successes during the pandemic. Perhaps the greatest example has been the Trump administration’s Operation Warp Speed, which worked to quickly develop a vaccine for the virus.

This no-nonsense approach showed what can happen when the government reduces red tape and allows our top scientists and researchers to do allow what they do best: develop cutting-edge solutions to keep people alive and healthier.

Despite the fact that taxpayers had to spend billions of dollars to convince drug makers that developing a vaccine would be worthwhile, economic analysis by economists at the University of Chicago (see related article, page 9) shows “vaccinating the population against COVID-19 six months earlier was worth about $1.8 trillion to the U.S. alone, in terms of lives save and accelerating the return to normal schooling, work, socializing.” Spending is all about priorities, and in this case, the choice was a wise one.

Given the overwhelming success of Operation Warp Speed, one cannot help but wonder if it’s time the federal government lightens up on the drug regulatory process altogether. On average, it takes 12 years and $2.9 billion to bring a drug from lab to market.

Free to Choose – A Solution

A good first step is to implement a policy proposal known as “Free to Choose Medicine (FTCM).”  This approach would apply free-market principles to the draconian drug approval process by allowing patients to have access to therapies before they have received the gold stamp of approval from the FDA.

Under FTCM, the choice to try an experimental treatment would be up to the patient, not government regulators—the kind of idea that might have been championed by the late “free to choose” economist Milton Friedman. FTCM would create a pathway for patients who have exhausted all other treatment possibilities and want access to unapproved, yet potentially life-saving, therapies. Once a drug is demonstrated to be safe, drug companies could test its efficacy in the open market. Currently, efficacy testing is done in stages in controlled trials, a process that can take years, and trials are done on limited populations.

Currently, Right to Try (RTT) legislation aims for a similar goal, but this approach is internally flawed because it doesn’t provide a market incentive for a biopharmaceutical company to bypass efficacy testing. The goal of drug regulatory agencies should be to allow good drugs to succeed sooner, and bad drugs to fail faster.

Similarly, the federal government needs to allow the free market to explore new uses for existing drugs. Drug agencies have blocked these efforts with COVID a point made repeatedly during the hearings in November and December on early outpatient COVID treatment before the U.S. Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. Because there is limited profit potential for the private market to do the required testing on new uses for generics, the federal government may need to step up. However, at the very least, the federal government should get out of the way and give the decision-making power to health care providers.

America should be front and center, leading the world in the development of state-of-the-art drugs and treatments. But unfortunately, FDA’s arbitrary regulations blunt the development of timely, affordable drug development. It is time for the FDA to act as a bridge to innovation and build off the success of Operation Warp Speed, which has shown drugs can be developed in record time if regulators get out of the way.

 

Christina Herrin (CHerrin@heartland.org) is the government relations manager of health policy at The Heartland Institute. A version of this article appeared on Townhall.com on January 29. Reprinted with permission.

 

 

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -

Most Popular

Fracking Ban Threatens American Jobs and Derails Our Environmental Progress

Banning fracking ignores sound science in favor of a false choice between environmental quality and natural gas. With the increase of natural gas consumption, particularly in power generation, the U.S. has reduced carbon dioxide emissions to their lowest levels in a generation.

Americans Should ‘Just Say No’ to Vaccine Passports – Commentary

"The truth, understood by well-balanced adults, is that there is no safety in this world, and our overlords’ attempts after a chimerical perfect safety are far more dangerous than any viral disease."

Restrictions, Masks Fail to Stop COVID, Fauci Confused

States with some of the strictest orders to contain the spread of COVID-19 are seeing a surge in new cases, according to an analysis by NPR.

The Left Wants Kids to See White Supremacy Everywhere, and It’s Destroying Pop Culture

By Douglas Blair “Certain elements of our community are threatening to get people fired,” tweeted Yale professor Nicholas Christakis on Apr. 3. “Even if someone just poses...
- Advertisement -

Recent Comments

Scottar Brooke on Free Speech? Forget It.
Randy M Verret on The Gaslight Election
S. T. Karnick on The Gaslight Election
Randy M Verret on The Gaslight Election
S. T. Karnick on The Gaslight Election
Randy M Verret on The Gaslight Election
S. T. Karnick on The Gaslight Election
Randy Verret on The Gaslight Election
Randy Verret on The Gaslight Election