Home Health Care News Medical Journals Pull COVID Treatment Studies over Data Flaws

Medical Journals Pull COVID Treatment Studies over Data Flaws

Amid concern about data flaws, The Lancet and The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) retracted reports discrediting off-label drugs being used to treat and prevent COVID-19.

On June 4, 2020, The Lancet pulled a study it published stating hydroxychloroquine (HCQ)— a possible COVID-19 treatment touted by President Trump—and another anti-malarial drug, chloroquine, were ineffective treatments for COVID-19 and increased the risk for heart problems and death. Hours later, NEJM retracted a study discrediting a blood pressure medication being used for COVID-19 treatment. The studies were done by the same company, Surgisphere, and used retrospective data, not data from a randomized, controlled study.

Outside experts raised red flags in the Lancet study when they noticed inconsistencies in the data. Surgisphere failed to provide its raw data for peer review, stating it was prohibited from doing so by contractual obligations.

Politics in Medical Science

HCQ is a generic and inexpensive drug that has been safely used to treat malaria and autoimmune diseases such as lupus.

The drug has been in the spotlight since President Trump tweeted March 21 that for COVID-19, HCQ and the antibiotic Azithromycin, “have a real chance to be one for the biggest game changers in the history of medicine.” On May 18, Trump said he was taking the drug to protect himself from the getting the disease and his physician stated the benefit outweighed the risk.

Since then, there have been numerous media reports discrediting the drug. Several states, such as Michigan, threatened civil action against physicians who prescribed the drug for a use other than its approved purpose. Such use is known as “off label” and is a practice widely accepted by physicians.

Coverage by the media has been “consistently biased,” wrote  Connor Harris in the City Journal, June 5, 2020. Harris notes there is evidence in small data sets that HCQ does show promise in treating COVID-19 in its early stages but “has gone almost entirely ignored by most media outlets.”  Harris states while research on the drug’s efficacy and risks needs to be continued, “what is not warranted “is portrayal of HCQ as deadly.”

The retractions by medical journals is equally alarming, says Marilyn Singleton, M.D., J.D. and past president of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons.

“The Lancet debacle illustrates the danger of injecting politics into medical science,” Singleton told Health Care News. “Some media outlets perversely reported with glee that “Trump’s drug” was useless. We all should be disappointed that multiple reports of clinical successes were not validated in a well-publicized study.”

Getting information to the public about a previously unknown virus and one that has upended lives is key, Singleton says.

“Dodgy research methods neither advance our knowledge of COVID-19 nor give us confidence in the guidelines from the experts,” Singleton said.

Pandemic Book Nixed

Medical journals and media outlets are not the only institutions under fire for trying to control the discussion around COVID-19. The same week of the retractions, Elon Musk called out Amazon founder Jeff Bezos for rejecting a book questioning the severity of the pandemic.

Author and former New York Times reporter Alex Berenson tweeted that Kindle Direct Publishing would not make his book, “Unreported Truths about Covid-19 and Lockdowns,” available on its platform. After the tweets, Kindle announced the book would be available.

Singleton says it is important to let the public judge content.

“While social media may not be the best sources for reliable information, these platforms helped expose the bogus study,” Singleton said. “We should all take heed: to paraphrase Jeremy Bentham, the first target of censorship is rarely the last.”

 

AnneMarie Schieber (amschieber@heartland.org) is managing editor of Health Care News.

AnneMarie Schieber
AnneMarie Schieber is a research fellow at The Heartland Institute and managing editor of Health Care News, Heartland's monthly newspaper for health care reform.

1 COMMENT

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -

Most Popular

Heartland Plan Offers Lifetime Health Accounts

 A central feature of the 26-page American Health Care Plan (ACHP) is the health ownership account which would incentivize consumers to spend more wisely on health care and encourage providers to give more bang for the buck.

This Week in the News

Eileen Griffin covers the biggest stories from this week in the Heartland Daily News. https://youtu.be/rfVemSsbLrw Referenced stories: Ninety-Eight Percent of the Way There: Trump's Super V-Shaped Recovery Kenosha...

8 Takeaways as Senate Panel Deadlocks on Bill to Nationalize Elections, Nullify Voter ID

By Fred Lucas In a party-line vote Tuesday, a Senate committee deadlocked 9-9 on a bill that would nullify voter ID and other state election...

Buchanan: Are the Halcyon Days Over for Joe Biden?

On taking the oath of office, Jan. 20, Joe Biden may not have realized it, but history had dealt him a pair of aces. The...
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

Recent Comments

MaryJean38@Comcast.net on CDC Ignores Scientific Studies on Masks
Many Climate Crisis Claims Are Based on Manipulated Science on How to End Biden’s Fake Climate Apocalypse
Scottar Brooke on Free Speech? Forget It.
Randy M Verret on The Gaslight Election
S. T. Karnick on The Gaslight Election
Randy M Verret on The Gaslight Election
S. T. Karnick on The Gaslight Election
Randy M Verret on The Gaslight Election
S. T. Karnick on The Gaslight Election
Randy Verret on The Gaslight Election
Randy Verret on The Gaslight Election
Breonna Taylor Settlement: What it means for No-knock Warrants – Gun News on U.S. Senator Attacked by Mob
Breonna Taylor Settlement: What it means for No-knock Warrants ~ N6AQ.com on U.S. Senator Attacked by Mob