The latest bad education news comes to us courtesy of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP).
The most recent exam was administered to high school seniors in early 2019, a full year before the COVID-19 lockdowns. The so-called “Nation’s Report Card” reveals that just 37 percent of 12th-graders are proficient in reading and a pitiful 24 percent in math. In fact, the average reading score for grade 12 students was lower than in 1992.
Peggy Carr, a National Center for Education Statistics commissioner, tried to excuse the poor showing by explaining that due to lower dropout rates, a lot of students took the test who would not have done so a few years ago. Fair enough, but what about all the students who did drop out? Had they taken the test, the average score would have been even lower.
Not surprisingly, all the usual suspects are blaming the seniors’ abysmal performance on the claim that the United States has defunded education. Front and center is Usual Suspect #1: American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten, who groused in a press release about “two decades of austerity” and “competition.” Weingarten also went off on the unions’ avowed enemy, U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos, who Weingarten claims is “hellbent on siphoning public money to expand private school vouchers.”
About austerity, Weingarten is wrong. Dead wrong. The following chart from the U.S. Department of Education shows just how off the mark she is.
As the chart shows, inflation-adjusted per‐pupil public spending grew by 39 percent between 1991-1992 and 2016-2017. In addition, as Cato Institute scholar Neal McCluskey points out, “spending between 2016–17 and the 2019 NAEP administration probably continued to grow as the economy improved.”
If Weingarten thinks there is a lack of money in education now, wait till she sees the fallout from the COVID-19 school closures that she and other unionistas have been demanding. With many private schools having opened up and home schooling going viral, there is no telling how many families will permanently ditch their traditional ZIP-code-mandated school.
Not only that, but as a result of the coronavirus and ensuing panic, job losses will result in a shrinking tax base in many states and districts. Schools should get ready for less funding, perhaps a lot less.
But the blow can be softened if certain reforms are implemented. To improve education and, at the same time, lower costs, collective bargaining deals and employee benefits should be renegotiated and capital projects should be put on hold. Step-and-ladder pay schedules and give-away-the-farm teacher pensions must be done away with. We need to put an end to union-mandated rules that elevate seniority above quality in hiring, firing, placement, and promotion of teachers, and eliminate tenure, or permanence, which pretty much guarantees a teacher lifetime employment no matter how incompetent she or he may be.
Most importantly, we must start funding parents—those who have solely the best interests of their children at heart—instead of pouring money into the bureaucracy, whose main raison d’être is to keep itself up and running.
And finally, a few words on Weingarten’s comment about competition. Despite her lament, competition works quite well. Researcher Greg Forster looked at 34 studies on the effects of school choice on government schools. He found that in 32 of them, school choice improves academic outcomes in public schools affected by the program, while one finds no visible difference and one finds a negative impact
Our education system is failing too many students, and that failure is not due to a lack of money. Until we realize that, and make some major changes, 13 years of public schooling may not get you very far in life at all.
[Originally posted at the California Policy Center.]
[…] place. Limited access to quality teaching, decent facilities, and rigorous curriculum often lead to achievement gaps. Children in low-income, minority families often suffer from these […]