Home Health Care News Commentary: Medicare for All is No Match for a Coronavirus

Commentary: Medicare for All is No Match for a Coronavirus

The coronavirus has claimed more than 900 lives around the world so far, including that of Dr. Li Wenliang, the Chinese doctor who first warned of its potential dangers. There are more than 40,000 reported coronavirus cases worldwide, including 12 in the United States. Although the pathogen has reached our shores, U.S. health officials have told Americans there is no need to worry.

Countries with single-payer health care may have a more difficult time. In the not-too-distant past, Canada and the United Kingdom have struggled to handle outbreaks of everything from severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) to the seasonal flu.

That’s largely because these countries’ government-run, “Medicare-for-all”-style systems lack enough health care personnel, hospital beds, and other resources to meet the needs of their populations even in good times. A public health threat such as a pandemic can stretch single-payer health care to its breaking point.

First identified in Wuhan, China, the novel coronavirus causes a potentially deadly form of viral pneumonia. The pathogen belongs to the same family as SARS, which caused a global pandemic nearly two decades ago. Containing pathogens such as coronavirus requires fast action and close coordination among physicians, hospitals and public health officials. That’s tough to do when there aren’t enough doctors or hospital beds to accommodate the sick.

Canadian Patients in Hallways

During the first half of 2019, nearly half of the Canadian province of Ontario’s acute care hospitals were over 100 percent capacity, according to an analysis conducted by CBC News. Almost one-fourth of the province’s hospitals averaged 100 percent capacity—or more—over that period.

As the CBC reported last month, “overcrowding has become so common in Ontario hospitals that patient beds are now placed in hallways and conference rooms not only at times of peak demand, but routinely day after day.”

That kind of crowding could make quarantining patients difficult, if not impossible, in the midst of an outbreak. Leaving someone with coronavirus in a hallway or other communal space could expose countless patients and staff to the highly contagious pathogen.

Canada has experienced this kind of thing firsthand, during the SARS pandemic of 2002-2003. Nearly 375 people contracted SARS in Ontario, 44 of whom died. For context, SARS infected just 27 people in the United States—and killed none.

According to the final report of the Canadian government’s SARS commission, 72 percent of Canadians infected with SARS contracted the disease “in a health care setting.” Forty-five percent of that group were health care workers.

The report laid the blame on Canada’s “public health and emergency infrastructures,” which “were in a sorry state of decay.” Another government report concurred, saying the Canadian health care system “lacked adequate resources, was professionally impoverished and was generally incapable of fulfilling its mandate.”

Flu Derails UK Hospitals

Single-payer systems don’t just struggle with pandemics. Every year, the United Kingdom’s National Health Service (NHS) grapples with patient care during flu season. The British press calls this perennial disaster “the winter crisis.”

During the 2018-2019 winter, one in four patients waited more than four hours in major emergency departments. That year, those departments were so crowded that over 11 percent of ambulances carrying patients were kept waiting outside hospitals for more than 30 minutes.

In January 2018, NHS postponed approximately 55,000 operations because of an outbreak of seasonal illnesses such as the flu. One doctor in central England apologized for what he called “third-world conditions,” including 12-hour waits and patients being treated in corridors at his hospital. Another physician likened the scene in his London hospital to “battlefield medicine.”

The Canadian and British health care systems show just how hard it can be to battle an outbreak under single-payer. Let’s not replicate their experiences by adopting “Medicare-for-all.”

Sally Pipes, (SPipes@pacificresearch.org) is president, CEO and Thomas W. Smith Fellow in health care policy at the Pacific Research Institute. An earlier version of this article was published by foxnews.com, February 10, 2020. Reprinted with permission.

Sally C. Pipes
Sally C. Pipes is president and chief executive officer of the Pacific Research Institute, a San Francisco-based think tank founded in 1979.

1 COMMENT

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -

Most Popular

Plan to Put Consumers in Charge of Health Care Unveiled

The reform package, “Health Care Choices 2020: A Vision for the Future,” was developed by medical professionals, state and national health policy experts, and organizations dedicated to providing relief from high costs through more coverage options that emphasize choice, not mandates.

Senate Hearing Reveals Effort to Discredit Early, At-Home, COVID Treatment

McCullough stated there has not been just government culpability with the effort to discredit HCQ and early intervention, but malfeasance at the academic level.

Illinois Regulators Approve Dakota Access Pipeline Oil Capacity Expansion

The Illinois Commerce Commission approved a proposal for the Dakota Access Pipeline to double its capacity from 570,000 bpd to 1.1 million barrels per day.

San Francisco Considering Bill that Would Outlaw Smoking in Most Apartment Buildings

By Samantha Fillmore San Francisco’s City Board of Supervisors voted to advance a bill that would ban smoking inside private dwellings located in an apartment...
- Advertisement -

Recent Comments

Randy M Verret on The Gaslight Election
S. T. Karnick on The Gaslight Election
Randy M Verret on The Gaslight Election
S. T. Karnick on The Gaslight Election
Randy M Verret on The Gaslight Election
S. T. Karnick on The Gaslight Election
Randy Verret on The Gaslight Election
Randy Verret on The Gaslight Election