biofuels - search results

The United States Supreme Court has declined to hear an appeal of a lower court ruling that blocks the year around sale of gasoline containing 15 percent ethanol.

Conservatives in Congress face a false choice: Extend unwarranted tax breaks to a few politically favored entities or allow the federal government to collect even more...

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has proposed reducing in the amount of biofuel that refiners are required to blend into petroleum-based fuels.

Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack wants the nation’s farmers to join the fight against climate change.

Any mandated Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) standards and disclosure rules imposed on the markets should account for the economic, environmental, human rights costs of green energy requirements.

Federal agricultural policy has been permeated by political racketeering since President Franklin Roosevelt appointed America’s first farm dictator in 1933.

The government should not prop up any energy source, and should instead allow competitive markets to meet America’s energy needs. However well intentioned, tax subsidies look more like corporate welfare for politically connected industries, and much less effective at spurring a dominant, world-class energy sector.

The gravest threats plants, animals and habitats face are not from climate change. They are from “green” energy policies and programs implemented in the name of stabilizing Earth’s never-stable climate.

The $2.3 trillion, 5,593 page combined Coronavirus relief, omnibus government funding bill passed by Congress contained expensive climate and energy provisions unconnected to corona relief or essential government functions.